Case 3335165/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs O Ania v Advanced Training Academy (UK) Ltd and 1 other — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335165/2018
- Decision date
- 2 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Tuck QC
- Venue
- by telephone
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Mrs O Ania
Respondents
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a telephone hearing before Employment Judge Tuck QC sitting alone on 2 July 2020. The judgment records the claimant as Mrs O Ania and the respondents as Advanced Training Academy (UK) Ltd and Mr S Islam.
The only substantive disposition recorded in the judgment is that the victimisation claim was dismissed on withdrawal. No factual findings on liability, no reasons on the merits of the claim, and no monetary remedy are set out in the extracted text.
Because the claim was withdrawn, the judgment does not record any award of compensation or other remedy. The decision is therefore procedural only and does not contain a substantive determination of the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victimisation | The judgment records: 'The claim of victimisation is dismissed on withdrawal.' | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.