Case 3335173/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335173/2018
- Decision date
- 21 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Alliott
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss Naomi Blake's claims against The London Borough of Brent were heard at Watford in private on 21 June 2019 before Employment Judge Alliott sitting alone, with the claimant appearing in person and Mr P Livingston appearing for the respondent. The written record is dated 8 July 2019. The judgment records claims for unfair dismissal, defamation, breach of contract and a wages claim, and states that all were dismissed upon withdrawal.
The tribunal did not determine the merits of any of the claims. The written record states that oral reasons were given at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless a request was made by either party within 14 days of the decision being sent.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Claim for defamation; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Breach of contract | Dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | Judgment wording reads 'coded Wages Act'; dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.