Case 3335204/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Cairns v Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335204/2018
- Decision date
- 10 July 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Parkin
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Cairns
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that in case numbers 3335204/2018 and 2406379/2019 the proceedings were dismissed after the claimant withdrew the claims. No substantive findings on liability are set out in the extracted text, and the judgment does not record any remedy award.
The document is a short withdrawal judgment dated 1 June 2020 and sent to the parties on 10 July 2020. It identifies the respondent as Kentucky Fried Chicken (Great Britain) Ltd and states that the dismissal followed withdrawal by the claimant under rule 52. The extracted text does not specify any factual findings beyond the withdrawal.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing title/categories; the judgment text itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Claim type inferred from the GOV.UK listing title/categories; the judgment text itself only records that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claims by the claimant. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.