Case 3335254/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335254/2018
- Decision date
- 27 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Loy Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe respondent did not enter a response, attend the hearing, or provide written submissions. The claimant gave oral evidence that she had worked the hours claimed in September and October 2018 and had not been paid for those hours. The tribunal accepted that evidence as entirely truthful.
The tribunal found that the claimant was owed wages for September and October 2018 and a payment for her notice period. It noted an email of 12 October 2018 from a director of the respondent which implicitly acknowledged the claimant's entitlement and stated that she would be paid up until 31 October 2018.
The tribunal also accepted the claimant's evidence that she had not received itemised pay statements at any time during her employment. It made a declaration that the respondent was in breach of its duty to provide itemised pay statements, but no calculation was made because the claimant waived that entitlement.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal awarded £931.50 for September 2018 wages and £421.50 for October 2018 wages under s.13.1 Employment Rights Act 1996 and/or breach of contract jurisdiction. | Upheld | — | £1,353 |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for statutory notice succeeds and awards £240.40 in respect of her notice period. | Upheld | — | £240 |
| Other | Declaration that the respondent failed to provide itemised pay statements under s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996. The claimant waived calculation under ss.11 and 12. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,593
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
4 references- s.13.1 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.8 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.11 Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.12 Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.