Case 3335276/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the First v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335276/2018
- Decision date
- 28 October 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
- Venue
- Cambridge
- Panel members
- Ms Wendy Smith, Mr Ron Eyre
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the First
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe hearing took place at Cambridge on 8 and 9 October 2020 before Employment Judge K J Palmer with Ms Wendy Smith and Mr Ron Eyre as members. The tribunal noted that earlier case-management documents had transposed the two case numbers, but confirmed that 3335276/2018 was the live case. It also recorded that the respondents had withdrawn their own strike-out application, and it refused the claimant's application to strike out the respondents' responses for non-compliance with directions connected to that withdrawn application.
The tribunal accepted the claimant's earlier witness statement from the aborted 26 May 2020 hearing, refused her request for an adjournment, and allowed an amendment to include issues 3g, 3h, 3i and 3l under Selkent Bus Company v Moore [1996] ICR 836. It treated issue 3c as already raised in the ET1 and described the added issues as protected disclosure allegations. No merits findings were made on the substantive claims.
When the claimant then refused to proceed using the respondents' bundle and continued to shout and ignore directions, the tribunal struck out all of her claims of its own initiative under Rule 37(1)(b). It also said the same conduct justified strike-out under Rule 37(1)(c) and that the claims had not been actively pursued within Rule 37(1)(d). No monetary award was made because the claims were struck out before the merits hearing completed.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Age | — |
| Whistleblowing | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
| Working time regulations | Recorded from the judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- Rule 37(1)(b)
- Rule 37(1)(c)
- Rule 37(1)(d)
- Selkent Bus Company v Moore [1996] ICR 836
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.