Case 3335326/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335326/2018
- Decision date
- 4 April 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bloch QC
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a preliminary hearing before Employment Judge Bloch QC at Watford on 21 February 2019. The tribunal dismissed the claims in claim number 333201/2018 against Mr Otukn and Ms Katy Sewards because the claimant had not engaged in early conciliation in relation to those respondents, so the tribunal had no jurisdiction to hear those claims.
The tribunal also noted that, in case number 3335326/2018, the second reference to Mylan UK Healthcare Limited was an obvious duplication and should be deleted from the claim form. No substantive liability issues or remedies were determined in this judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal held it had no jurisdiction to hear the claims against Mr Otukn and Ms Katy Sewards because the claimant had not engaged in early conciliation in relation to those respondents. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.