Case 3335342/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person. For the v Respondent — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335342/2018
- Decision date
- 9 September 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Members
- Panel members
- Mr B McSweeney, Mr K Mizon
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person. For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant, Mr M Lis, brought a race discrimination claim against Niftylift Ltd. The hearing took place by CVP at Bury St Edmunds on 7, 8 and 9 September 2020 before Employment Judge Laidler, with Mr B McSweeney and Mr K Mizon sitting as members and an interpreter provided for Polish translation.
The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of conduct. It further found that the dismissal was not an act of less favourable treatment on the grounds of race. On that basis, the race discrimination claim failed and was dismissed.
The written record states that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that no written reasons would be provided unless requested. No monetary award was made or recorded in the judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The tribunal held that the claimant was dismissed by reason of conduct and that this was not an act of less favourable treatment on the grounds of race. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.