Case 3335361/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Garas v Respondent — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335361/2018
- Decision date
- 29 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge JUDGMENT Employment
Parties
1 namedClaimant
Mr A Garas
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment because the time for presenting a response had expired and no valid response had been presented. On the basis of the information before Employment Judge Bedeau, the tribunal entered judgment for the claimant on all pleaded claims recorded in the short judgment.
The tribunal stated that the claimant’s claims of unfair dismissal, detriment following making a protected disclosure, unpaid wages, breach of contract and holiday pay all succeeded. The judgment does not set out detailed findings of fact or separate reasoning for each head of claim in the extracted text, but it records success across the full range of claims listed.
No remedy was assessed in this judgment. Instead, the tribunal directed that a remedy hearing would be held on 10 September 2019 at the Employment Tribunals, 2nd Floor, 51 Clarendon Road, Watford, Hertfordshire, WD17 1HP. The extracted judgment contains no monetary award and no split between heads of loss.
Claims and outcomes
5 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant’s claim of unfair dismissal succeeded under Rule 21. | Upheld | — | — |
| Whistleblowing | The judgment describes this as a claim for detriment following making a protected disclosure, which succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant’s claim for unpaid wages succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claimant’s breach of contract claim succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The judgment states that the claimant’s holiday pay claim succeeded. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.