Case 3335372/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs N Parmar v AGC Glass UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335372/2018
- Decision date
- 20 November 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Johnson Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs N Parmar
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMrs N Parmar brought a claim against AGC Glass UK Ltd. By letter dated 21 September 2019, the Tribunal gave her an opportunity to make representations or to request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because it had not been actively pursued.
The judgment then states that the claim is struck out. No substantive findings on the underlying breach of contract or race discrimination allegations are recorded, and no monetary award is made.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment only states that 'the claim' is struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued; this head of claim is taken from the GOV.UK case listing. | Struck out | — | — |
| Race discrimination | The judgment only states that 'the claim' is struck out under rule 37 for not being actively pursued; this head of claim is taken from the GOV.UK case listing. | Struck out | Race | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.