Case 3335435/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs A de Rochebrune v BTP Advisers Limited — 2019
- Case reference
- 3335435/2018
- Decision date
- 30 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Henry Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs A de Rochebrune
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment in which Employment Judge Henry recorded that the claimant, Mrs A de Rochebrune, had succeeded in her claims against BTP Advisers Limited. The judgment states that the claimant’s claims of unlawful deductions of wages, holiday pay and breach of contract in respect of pension payment succeeded.
The decision does not set out detailed reasons on this page, but it determines liability in the claimant’s favour on each of those claims. No compensatory or other monetary award is fixed in the judgment itself.
The tribunal instead listed a separate remedy hearing for 30 July 2019 at Watford, with a one-hour time estimate, to deal with remedy following the liability judgment.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Judgment under Rule 21. Liability only; remedy was listed for a separate hearing on 30 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | Judgment under Rule 21. Liability only; remedy was listed for a separate hearing on 30 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
| Breach of contract | The judgment states that the claim for breach of contract in respect of pension payment succeeded. Liability only; remedy was listed for a separate hearing on 30 July 2019. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 21 Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.