Case 3335458/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Did not attend For the v Ms J Gould, Solicitor — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335458/2018
- Decision date
- 26 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Palmer Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Did not attend For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt the hearing in Watford on 26 February 2020, before Employment Judge Palmer, the claimant did not attend and the respondent was represented by Ms J Gould, solicitor. The written judgment states that the claimant's claims were dismissed following his withdrawal of them on that date.
The record does not set out any substantive findings on the merits of the pleaded claims, and no remedy was awarded. The judgment is therefore a procedural disposal reflecting withdrawal rather than determination of the underlying allegations.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed following his withdrawal of them on 26 February 2020. | Withdrawn | Race | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed following his withdrawal of them on 26 February 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment records that the claimant's claims were dismissed following his withdrawal of them on 26 February 2020. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.