Case 3335493/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr C Eluwa v Sanctuary Supported Living — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335493/2018
- Decision date
- 3 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr C Eluwa
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment in Mr C Eluwa v Sanctuary Supported Living. By letter dated 24 November 2019, the Tribunal gave the claimant an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out because he had not complied with the Tribunal's order dated 9 December 2019 and because the claim had not been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out all the claims.
As a result of the strike out, the hearing listed for 3 March 2020 did not take place. The extracted judgment does not record any merits findings or any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The judgment states that 'all the claims' were struck out under rule 37 for failure to comply with the Tribunal's order dated 9 December 2019 and for not being actively pursued. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying claim types. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37 strike out
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.