Case 3335524/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Hunter v Babcock Critical Services Limited — 2026
- Case reference
- 3335524/2018
- Decision date
- 29 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Hyams Dated
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Hunter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the proceedings brought by Mr T Hunter against Babcock Critical Services Limited were dismissed because the claimant withdrew the claim. No findings on the merits of the underlying complaint were made, and the judgment does not record any award or other substantive disposal beyond dismissal following withdrawal.
Employment Judge Hyams signed the judgment on 9 September 2019, and it was sent to the parties on 17 September 2019. The extracted text does not identify any lay members, hearing dates, or remedy.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The judgment only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate merits finding or award is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment only states that the proceedings were dismissed following withdrawal of the claim by the claimant; no separate merits finding or award is recorded. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.