Case 3335544/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In Person For the v Mr D Adams, Manager Mr H Joseph, Chairman CONSENT — 2020
- Case reference
- 3335544/2018
- Decision date
- 7 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Bedeau Representation
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
In Person For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a hearing in Watford on 14 January 2020 before Employment Judge Bedeau, with the claimant appearing in person and Mr D Adams and Mr H Joseph for the respondent, the tribunal made a consent judgment. The order recorded that proceedings would be withdrawn upon the respondent's compliance with settlement terms.
The respondent was to pay the claimant £1,708 net by 4pm on 31 January 2020. If no application was made by 4pm on 7 February 2020, all claims against the respondent would be dismissed without further order.
The judgment contains no findings on liability and no reasoned analysis of the merits. It disposes of the proceedings by consent and does not allocate the agreed sum between the underlying claims.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | Consent judgment recorded settlement terms only; the judgment text does not itemise the claim, so this category is taken from the gov.uk listing. The agreed sum of £1,708 net was not allocated between claims. | Settled | Race | — |
| Sex discrimination | Consent judgment recorded settlement terms only; the judgment text does not itemise the claim, so this category is taken from the gov.uk listing. The agreed sum of £1,708 net was not allocated between claims. | Settled | Sex | — |
| Unfair dismissal | Consent judgment recorded settlement terms only; the judgment text does not itemise the claim, so this category is taken from the gov.uk listing. The agreed sum of £1,708 net was not allocated between claims. | Settled | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,708
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.