Case 3335552/2018 · Employment Tribunal
In person For the v Respondent — 2021
- Case reference
- 3335552/2018
- Decision date
- 22 July 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord Members
- Panel members
- Ms S Elizabeth, Mr R Eyre
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person For the
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Cambridge by CVP on 19 and 20 July 2021 before Employment Judge Ord, with Ms S Elizabeth and Mr R Eyre as members. The Claimant appeared in person and the Respondent was represented by counsel.
The written judgment records a unanimous decision that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded and that her claim was dismissed. No separate findings of liability, remedy, or compensation are set out in the extracted text.
The record also states that reasons for the judgment were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested in accordance with the tribunal's note.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Race discrimination | The written record states only that the Claimant's complaints were not well founded and the claim was dismissed. The case context identifies the matter as a race discrimination claim. | Dismissed | Race | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.