Miss S Offler v Grass Valley Limited — 2026

Case reference: 3335579/2018
Decision date: 29 April 2026
Jurisdiction: England & Wales
Judge: Employment Judge R Lewis Date

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

Miss S Offler

Respondent

Grass Valley Limited

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The only reasoning recorded in the extracted judgment is that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on liability, and no merits determination is recorded.

The extracted text does not specify the individual causes of action, although the GOV.UK listing for the case identifies disability discrimination, sex discrimination, and unfair dismissal categories. Because the judgment itself only records withdrawal, this extraction treats the adjudicated outcome as a withdrawn claim with no substantive determination.

No monetary award is recorded in the judgment, and there is no separate remedy analysis in the extracted text. The judgment was sent to the parties on 26 October 2019, following the withdrawal recorded in the judgment dated 7 October 2019.

Claims and outcomes

1 finding recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Other	The judgment records that the proceedings were dismissed following a withdrawal of the claim by the claimant. No substantive findings on the merits are set out in the extracted text.	Withdrawn	—	—

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.