Case 3335605/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Employment tribunal upholds unlawful-deduction-from-wages claim against Samurai Sashimi
The tribunal recorded that the respondent, Samurai Sashimi, had failed to enter a response. Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the claim therefore succeeded by default.
- Case reference
- 3335605/2018
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Byrne
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr AA Kabir
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal recorded that the respondent, Samurai Sashimi, had failed to enter a response. Under Rule 21 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013, the claim therefore succeeded by default.
The judgment does not set out any substantive findings on the underlying wages issue in this document. It records only that the claim succeeded and that the remedy was to be determined at a later Remedy Hearing.
No monetary award is stated in this judgment. No split of compensation, interest, or other remedy component is given here, and no panel members are listed beyond the regional employment judge signing the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Claim succeeded under Rule 21 because the respondent failed to enter a response. The judgment states that remedy would be determined at a Remedy Hearing. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
2 references- Rule 21
- Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.