Case 3335630/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Mr Dobariya For the v Mr Loy (solicitor) — 2021
- Case reference
- 3335630/2018
- Decision date
- 4 October 2021
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Anderson Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr Dobariya For the
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe written judgment records that the claimant's unpaid wages claim and his claim for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions were dismissed upon withdrawal. No substantive findings are set out on those two claims in the written record beyond the fact of withdrawal.
The claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim was dismissed. The judgment is limited to the outcome and does not set out written reasons, noting that reasons were given orally at the hearing and that written reasons would not be provided unless requested within 14 days. No monetary award is recorded.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for unpaid wages was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Other | The judgment states that the claimant's claim for failure to provide a written statement of terms and conditions was dismissed upon withdrawal. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Constructive dismissal | The judgment dismisses the claimant's constructive unfair dismissal claim. | Dismissed | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.