Case 3335643/2018 · Employment Tribunal
Gilbert Mhlanga v Green Cleaning Services (Cambridge) Ltd — 2018
- Case reference
- 3335643/2018
- Decision date
- 30 October 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Michell
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Gilbert Mhlanga
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge Michell, sitting alone at Cambridge on 21 August 2019, found that Gilbert Mhlanga had not been paid salary due for 7 hours' work he carried out on 24 October 2018 at £7.83 per hour. That part of the claim was well founded, and the tribunal ordered Green Cleaning Services (Cambridge) Ltd to pay £54.81, subject to any necessary deductions for tax and National Insurance contributions.
The tribunal also recorded that the respondent had on or about 20 August 2019 paid the claimant £212.82 net in respect of work done on 25, 26, 29 and 30 October 2018. In light of that payment, the remainder of the claim was dismissed, with liberty for the claimant to apply to vary the judgment if it later transpired that the money had not in fact been paid.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal held that the claimant had not been paid salary due for 7 hours' work on 24 October 2018 at £7.83 per hour. The remainder of the claim, relating to work on 25, 26, 29 and 30 October 2018, was dismissed after the respondent had paid £212.82 net on or about 20 August 2019. | Upheld | — | £55 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £55
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.