Case 3400065/2013 · Employment Tribunal
Mr A Hack v Vehicle Medic Ltd — 2017
- Case reference
- 3400065/2013
- Decision date
- 21 April 2017
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr A Hack
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningBy letter dated 24 March 2017, the Tribunal gave Mr A Hack an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing as to why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued. The judgment records that he failed to make written representations, failed to make sufficient representations, or failed to request a hearing.
The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim under rule 37. The judgment is procedural only and does not determine the merits of any underlying substantive complaint, nor does it record any monetary award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Struck out under rule 37 because the claim had not been actively pursued. The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.