Case 3400086/2017 · Employment Tribunal
not present or represented For the v Mr R. Scuplak, consultant TELEPHONE PRELIMINARY HEARING — 2018
- Case reference
- 3400086/2017
- Decision date
- 1 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Heal Appearances
- Venue
- Watford
Parties
2 namedClaimant
not present or represented For the
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis document is a procedural telephone preliminary hearing in case numbers 3400086/2017 to 3400093/2017, heard at Watford on 31 October 2018 before Employment Judge Heal. The claimants were not present or represented; the respondent was represented by Mr R. Scuplak, consultant. No-one appeared on behalf of the claimants on the telephone from 10.00 to 10.15 for the hearing.
Because the claimants did not appear, the tribunal postponed the preliminary hearing to a date to be listed. The parties were directed to send the tribunal, in writing, the dates on which they would be available to take part in a one-hour telephone preliminary hearing, within 7 days of the date the document was sent to the parties. The judgment records no substantive findings on the pleaded claims and no remedy determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This was a telephone preliminary hearing. The tribunal noted that no-one appeared for the claimants between 10.00 and 10.15 and postponed the preliminary hearing to a later date to be listed. No substantive claim was adjudicated in this judgment. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.