Case 3400152/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr D Clark v Kier Group & others — 2020
- Case reference
- 3400152/2015
- Decision date
- 6 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ord
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr D Clark
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment concerns case numbers 3400152/2015 and 3401239/2016 brought by Mr D Clark against Kier Group & Others. On 24 December 2019, the Tribunal wrote to the claimant giving him an opportunity to make representations, or to request a hearing, on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The claimant did not make written representations, or did not make any sufficient representations, and did not request a hearing. The Tribunal therefore struck out the claim. The extracted text does not identify the substantive nature of the underlying claim or claims, and no remedy was awarded.
The decision is a short procedural judgment only. It records dismissal of the proceedings by strike-out on the basis of non-pursuit, without any findings on the merits of the underlying dispute.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not state the substantive cause or causes of action. It records that the claim in case numbers 3400152/2015 and 3401239/2016 was struck out because it had not been actively pursued. | Struck out | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.