Case 3400194/2017 · Employment Tribunal
In person, assisted by Mr S Glasby, family member For the 1st v Respondent — 2018
- Case reference
- 3400194/2017
- Decision date
- 12 November 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Laidler Appearances
- Venue
- Bury St Edmunds
Parties
1 namedClaimant
In person, assisted by Mr S Glasby, family member For the 1st
Respondent
- —
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard at Bury St Edmunds on 1 October 2018 before Employment Judge Laidler. The respondents did not attend. The tribunal recorded that Ankhor Ltd had written on 24 September 2018 saying it was prepared to pay £667.79, but no settlement had been reached and the hearing proceeded.
The tribunal entered judgment for the admitted sum of £667.79. It also awarded £365.41 in respect of a further deduction from the claimant’s final pay. On that issue, the tribunal accepted the claimant’s evidence that he had not seen the letter relied on by the respondent, and it found no evidence of proper notification to him or that his consent had been obtained.
The tribunal was not satisfied that a claim for failure to inform and consult under regulation 15 of TUPE 2006 was actually before it. It therefore made a case management order for the claimant to consider whether he wished to pursue that issue by application to amend. It also clarified that the claimant’s request to recover £680 for attendance time and £46.44 mileage was not a costs award as sought, and that any further application would have to be for preparation time costs under the tribunal rules.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal ordered the admitted sum of £667.79 and a further £365.41 deducted from the claimant’s final pay. For the latter, it found no evidence of proper notification to the claimant or that his consent had been obtained. | Upheld | — | £1,033 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,033
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.