Case 3401143/2015 · Employment Tribunal
Mr WP Burns v Hewlett Constrution Limited & Others — 2018
- Case reference
- 3401143/2015
- Decision date
- 10 July 2018
- Jurisdiction
- England & Wales
- Judge
- Employment Judge Moore Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr WP Burns
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 37 strike-out judgment in the case of Mr WP Burns v Hewlett Constrution Limited & Others. The tribunal recorded that, by letter dated 14 June 2016, the claimant was given an opportunity to make representations or request a hearing on why the claim should not be struck out for not having been actively pursued.
The judgment states that no response to that letter was submitted. On that basis, Employment Judge Moore ordered that the claim be struck out. No substantive merits findings or monetary remedy were recorded in the decision.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal did not describe the underlying substantive cause of action in this short strike-out judgment. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 4 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.