Case 4100003/2022 · Employment Tribunal
David Wilson v Kingdom Bakeries Limited (In creditors’ voluntary liquidation) — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100003/2022
- Decision date
- 21 March 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Russell Bradley
Parties
2 namedClaimant
David Wilson
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningDavid Wilson was employed by Kingdom Bakeries Limited as technical manager from 18 June 2016 until 14 February 2022. The respondent entered creditors' voluntary liquidation on 14 February 2022. No ET3 was lodged and the respondent did not attend or represent itself at the final hearing. The tribunal accepted the claimant's evidence as credible and reliable.
On the notice pay claim, the tribunal held that the respondent had breached the contract by failing to give notice of termination. However, it awarded no damages because the claimant had mitigated his loss in full by obtaining alternative employment with a higher net salary than he had received from the respondent. On the redundancy claim, the liquidators' letter assumed that the claimant was entitled to a redundancy payment, and the statutory presumption under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 was not contradicted. Using gross weekly pay of £615.38, five years' service and age 44 at 14 February 2022, the tribunal awarded £3,536.00.
On wages, the tribunal found that the claimant had received no pay from August 2021 to 14 February 2022 and held that the arrears were unlawful deductions from wages. It awarded £10,564.05. On holiday pay, the tribunal accepted that the claimant had taken no paid leave in the 2020/21 and 2021/22 leave years and awarded £4,654.24 in lieu of accrued untaken leave, calculated as £2,482.26 for the full 5.6 weeks due for 2020/21 and £2,171.98 for the proportion due to 14 February 2022. The total awarded was £18,754.29.
Claims and outcomes
4 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Redundancy | The tribunal held the claimant was entitled to a statutory redundancy payment. It applied the statutory presumption under section 163 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, which was not contradicted, and calculated the award using gross weekly pay of £615.38, five years' service and age 44 at 14 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £3,536 |
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found that no pay had been received from August 2021 to 14 February 2022 and held that those arrears were unlawful deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £10,564 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the claimant had taken no paid leave in the 2020/21 and 2021/22 leave years and awarded payment in lieu of accrued untaken holiday. It calculated £2,482.26 for the full 5.6 weeks due for 2020/21 and £2,171.98 for the proportion due to 14 February 2022. | Upheld | — | £4,654 |
| Breach of contract | The tribunal treated the notice pay claim as a claim for damages for breach of contract arising from the failure to give notice of termination. It said the breach succeeded, but awarded no damages because the claimant had mitigated his loss in full by obtaining alternative work with a higher net salary. | Upheld | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £18,754
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.