Case 4100006/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr J Savage v Not present Akela Construction Limited — 2025
- Case reference
- 4100006/2025
- Decision date
- 5 February 2025
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge E Mannion
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr J Savage
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningAt a preliminary hearing in Glasgow on 25 February 2025, Employment Judge E Mannion considered a time-bar issue in Mr J Savage's case against Akela Construction Limited. The claimant had emailed the tribunal on 24 February 2025 saying he could not attend because of poor mental health and was not fit enough to attend, but he did not provide medical evidence. The claimant was unrepresented, and the respondent was represented by a solicitor.
At the outset of the hearing, the respondent applied for the claim to be dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 because the claimant was absent. The tribunal accepted that the reason given for non-attendance was health-related, but held that the hearing could not proceed without the claimant because the purpose of the hearing was to decide whether it was reasonably practicable to present the claim within the three-month time limit and, if not, whether it was presented within a further reasonable period.
Taking account of the overriding objective and Rule 47, the judge dismissed the claim. The judgment records that the claimant could seek reconsideration within 14 days if he considered that to be necessary in the interests of justice.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | Dismissed under Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024 after the claimant did not attend the preliminary hearing listed to consider time bar. The judgment records that the merits of the underlying claim were not determined. | Dismissed | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 47 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
- overriding objective
- reasonably practicable / further reasonable period
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.