Case 4100008/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs Lynne Dill v OneRen — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100008/2023
- Decision date
- 7 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge R McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow via Audio
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs Lynne Dill
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge R McPherson sat alone in Glasgow via audio on 2 March 2023. The judgment records that Mrs Lynne Dill's claims under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. No separate findings, factual reasoning, or remedy awards are set out in the extracted text.
The available text does not specify the individual Equality Act allegation or allegations, and it does not record any monetary award. The judgment was entered in the register on 7 March 2023 and copied to the parties on that date.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pregnancy and maternity discrimination | The extracted judgment text states only that the claimant's claims under the Equality Act 2010 were dismissed. It does not break out separate heads of claim or specify the protected characteristic, so the claim is classified from the case listing context as pregnancy and maternity. | Dismissed | Pregnancy and maternity | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.