Case 4100023/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100023/2019 Mr M Mordal v The Hydropathic Hotel Pitlochry Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100023/2019
- Decision date
- 18 February 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100023/2019 Mr M Mordal
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and the Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The hearing listed for 12 April 2019 was cancelled.
The tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and ordered payment of £2,600.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with written terms and conditions of employment and ordered payment of two weeks' wages, stated as £4,000. The extracted judgment does not specify any further reasoning or statutory provision for that award.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £2,600 |
| Other | The judgment records a failure to provide written terms and conditions of employment and orders payment of two weeks' wages. The extracted text does not specify the statutory basis for this award. | Upheld | — | £4,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,600
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.