Case 4100024/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100024/2020 Mrs I Afanasjeva v The Manna House Wholesale Limited — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100024/2020
- Decision date
- 10 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100024/2020 Mrs I Afanasjeva
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a rule 21 judgment on the papers because no response had been presented to the claim. Employment Judge Mark Whitcombe issued judgment on the available material and cancelled the hearing listed for 20 March 2020.
The tribunal found that Mrs I Afanasjeva was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice. It ordered The Manna House Wholesale Limited to pay damages of £300 for that breach.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement. It ordered payment of £600 in respect of holiday pay. The judgment records no other substantive findings or remedy components.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | The tribunal found dismissal was in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered damages of £300. | Upheld | — | £300 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £600. | Upheld | — | £600 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £900
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.