Case 4100028/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100028/2020 Miss D Mitchell v Enrico Curtis — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100028/2020
- Decision date
- 17 February 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mel Sangster
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100028/2020 Miss D Mitchell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the Employment Judge issued a judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. The tribunal found that Miss D Mitchell had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and ordered the respondent, Enrico Curtis, to pay damages of £3,516.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and was entitled to a redundancy payment of £9,632. The hearing listed for 27 March 2020 was cancelled. No discrimination, unfair dismissal, or other statutory claims were recorded in the judgment, and no legal test was expressly cited.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Breach of contract | Award for dismissal in breach of contract in respect of notice under a rule 21 judgment. | Upheld | — | £3,516 |
| Redundancy | Tribunal found the claimant was dismissed by reason of redundancy and entitled to a redundancy payment. | Upheld | — | £9,632 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £13,148
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.