Case 4100030/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Miss T Drysdale v North Ayrshire Community Youth Hub and 2 others — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100030/2019
- Decision date
- 21 June 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
4 namedClaimant
Miss T Drysdale
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss T Drysdale brought a claim for unlawful deductions from wages. The tribunal held that the first respondent, North Ayrshire Community Youth Hub, was not a legal entity against which a claim could be validly made, so the claim against that respondent was dismissed.
The tribunal found that the claim against the second and third respondents, Mr Andrew Millan and Ms Stacey Millan, succeeded. It recorded that they were members of the management committee of North Ayrshire Community Youth Hub and were liable for the unpaid wages claim.
The tribunal ordered the second and third respondents to pay the claimant £6,166 gross in respect of unlawful deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996, subject to deduction of income tax and national insurance as appropriate.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The claim against the first respondent was dismissed because it was not a legal entity against which a claim could validly be made. The claim against the second and third respondents, as members of the management committee of North Ayrshire Community Youth Hub, succeeded, and they were ordered to pay £6,166 gross in respect of unlawful deductions from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996. | Upheld | — | £6,166 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,166
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.