Case 4100031/2018 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100031/2018 Mrs L Elliott v Barclays Bank UK plc — 2018
- Case reference
- 4100031/2018
- Decision date
- 21 September 2018
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100031/2018 Mrs L Elliott
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment records that the claimant withdrew the claim. The tribunal therefore dismissed the claim under Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No findings on the merits of the unfair dismissal or disability discrimination allegations are recorded, and no remedy or monetary award is addressed in the judgment.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The listing categories indicate unfair dismissal and disability discrimination, but the judgment only states that 'the claim' was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not distinguish individual claims. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | The listing categories indicate disability discrimination, but the judgment only states that 'the claim' was withdrawn and dismissed under Rule 52; it does not provide findings on the merits. | Withdrawn | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.