Case 4100049/2019 · Employment Tribunal
Mr T Maguire v Represented by L Neil - Solicitor CS Wind UK Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100049/2019
- Decision date
- 31 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Rory McPherson
- Venue
- Glasgow
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr T Maguire
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a case management judgment, not a merits decision. The tribunal allowed the claimant's ET1 to be amended by addition of the document headed "PAPER APART TO ET1" circulated with the claimant's agent's e-mail of 2 April 2019.
The tribunal did not accept the claimant's e-mail of 15 April 2019 as further and better particulars amending the ET1 as amended. No substantive liability findings or remedy assessment were made in this judgment.
The tribunal ordered that the claim, as amended by the Paper Apart to the ET1, be listed for a final hearing of not less than four days, with date listing stencils for the period September 2019 onward to be circulated to the parties. Existing case management orders of 13 February 2019 numbers 1 and 2 were to remain in place for the new final hearing dates.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | This judgment does not determine the merits of any substantive claim. It amends the ET1 and gives case management directions for a final hearing. | Other | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.