Case 4100050/2023 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100050/2023 Mr G Caracciolo v Carbon Zero Business Services Ltd — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100050/2023
- Decision date
- 16 March 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Kearns Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100050/2023 Mr G Caracciolo
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response had been presented, so the Employment Judge issued a Rule 21 default judgment on the available material. The judgment records that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £1,764.
The tribunal also found that the claimant was dismissed in breach of contract in respect of notice and awarded damages of £640. In addition, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £697.60.
The judgment is dated 13 March 2023 and entered in the register on 16 March 2023. No other issues, legal tests, or remedy elements are set out in the text provided.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £1,764 |
| Breach of contract | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £640 |
| Holiday pay | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £698 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £3,102
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.