Case 4100052/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Miss K Arrol v Go-Centric Ltd (In creditors voluntary liquidation) The Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy. — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100052/2023
- Decision date
- 18 December 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Robison
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss K Arrol
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. No response was presented. The tribunal found that the claimant was entitled to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives and the claimant had been dismissed as redundant.
The tribunal held that the complaint under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was well founded. It found that the respondent had dismissed more than 20 employees at one establishment within a period of 90 days or less, and that the respondent failed to ensure employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and then consulted with them in accordance with section 188.
The tribunal therefore made a protective award for the employees based at Level 5, Portland House, 17 Renfield Street, Glasgow G2 5AH. The protected period began on 1 December 2022 and was 90 days. The judgment orders the respondent to pay remuneration for that protected period, but the extracted text does not state the monetary amount of the award.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | Rule 21 decision on the available material. The complaint was a protective award claim under sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992. The extracted text does not state a monetary figure for the award. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- Rule 21 Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- s.188 Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- s.188A Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.