Case 4100053/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100053/2017 & others (per attached schedule) Mrs R Currie and others v Represented by: Dallas McMillan Solicitors Falkirk Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100053/2017
- Decision date
- 17 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100053/2017 & others (per attached schedule) Mrs R Currie and others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multiple claim schedule in Mrs R Currie and others v Falkirk Council, with case 4100053/2017 and 176 others. The judgment dated 17 August 2019 records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants.
Employment Judge Frances Eccles therefore dismissed the claims under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The judgment contains no findings on the merits of the equal pay claims and no liability determination against the respondent.
No remedy was awarded or quantified in the judgment. The order is procedural only and reflects the withdrawal of the claims rather than any substantive adjudication of the underlying disputes.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The claims were withdrawn by the claimants and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.