Case 4100065/2025 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S M Campbell v Timberworx Manufactured Joinery Ltd — 2026
- Case reference
- 4100065/2025
- Decision date
- 27 April 2026
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge D Hoey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S M Campbell
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal issued a Rule 22 judgment on the available material because no response had been presented to the claim. It found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant’s wages and ordered payment of £3,042, calculated as four weeks’ gross pay at £19.50 per hour on a 39-hour working week.
The tribunal also found that the claimant had been dismissed in breach of contract in respect of employer and employee pension contributions, and awarded damages of £1,038.59. It further found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant’s holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £2,756.89, calculated as 14.5 days’ gross pay at £190.13 per day.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Unauthorised deduction from wages; award stated as 4 weeks' gross pay at £19.50 per hour based on a 39-hour working week. | Upheld | — | £3,042 |
| Breach of contract | Breach of contract in respect of employer and employee pension contributions. | Upheld | — | £1,039 |
| Holiday pay | Failure to pay holiday entitlement; award stated as 14.5 days' gross pay at £190.13 per day. | Upheld | — | £2,757 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £6,837
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 22 of the Employment Tribunal Procedure Rules 2024
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.