Case 4100068/2021 · Employment Tribunal
Mr S Gibbons v Barrochan Limited (Dissolved) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100068/2021
- Decision date
- 14 July 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge S MacLean
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr S Gibbons
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningEmployment Judge S MacLean issued the judgment on 11 July 2023 in a case covering Mr S Gibbons and the other claimants named in the attached schedule against Barrochan Limited (Dissolved). The judgment records that the claims were struck out under rule 37 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013 because they had not been actively pursued.
On 14 February 2023 the claimants’ representative wrote to the tribunal confirming that they had withdrawn from acting for the claimants in the schedule. The tribunal then wrote directly to those claimants on 24 March 2023 and asked them to confirm the current position of their cases by 12 April 2023, but no reply was received.
The tribunal gave the claimants a further opportunity on 24 April 2023 to provide written reasons by 8 May 2023 or to request a hearing to explain why strike out should not be ordered. No acceptable reason was provided and no hearing was requested, so the tribunal struck out the claims under rule 37(1)(d) for non-pursuit.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The extracted judgment does not identify the underlying substantive claim type(s). The claims, listed in the attached schedule, were struck out collectively under rule 37(1)(d) for failure to actively pursue them. | Struck out | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- rule 37(1)(d) of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.