Case 4100084/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Miss Magdalena Roter v Joy Walton or Kerr — 2024
- Case reference
- 4100084/2024
- Decision date
- 20 March 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J Hendry
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Miss Magdalena Roter
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe case was heard in Glasgow by CVP on 20 March 2024 before Employment Judge J Hendry, with Miss Magdalena Roter appearing in person and the respondent, Joy Walton or Kerr, neither appearing nor being represented. The judgment states that reasons were given orally at the hearing.
The tribunal upheld the claimant's application for a finding of unlawful deduction from wages. It ordered the respondent to pay £2,000, described in the judgment as accrued unpaid wages and holiday pay.
The written judgment does not provide a separate breakdown between unpaid wages and holiday pay, and it does not record any further liability findings beyond the successful unlawful deduction from wages claim. It also records that the respondent satisfied the judgment by paying the claimant, subject to deduction of appropriate PAYE tax and national insurance where properly vouched.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal upheld the claimant's application for an unlawful deduction from wages. The written judgment says the £2,000 covered accrued unpaid wages and holiday pay; it does not split that figure between components. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £2,000
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.