Case 4100100/2024 · Employment Tribunal
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100100/2024 Miss G Laird v Jenny Berridge (Meldrums Ceres LTD) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4100100/2024
- Decision date
- 21 February 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Kemp Date
Parties
2 namedClaimant
16 A (Scot) Rule judgment template (simple) EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100100/2024 Miss G Laird
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningMiss G Laird brought a claim against Jenny Berridge (Meldrums Ceres Ltd). No response was presented, so Employment Judge A Kemp issued a Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The hearing listed for 20 March 2024 was cancelled.
On that material, the tribunal found that the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from wages contrary to section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £590.70 net. It also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement in breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and ordered payment of £344.60 net. The judgment stated that any income tax due on the sums awarded was payable by the respondent separately.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | The tribunal found an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13 of the Employment Rights Act 1996 and ordered payment of £590.70 net. | Upheld | — | £591 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found a failure to pay holiday entitlement in breach of the Working Time Regulations 1998 and also described the sum as an unauthorised deduction from wages under section 13; the net award was £344.60. | Upheld | — | £345 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £935
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
3 references- s.13 Employment Rights Act 1996
- Working Time Regulations 1998
- Rule 21
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.