Case 4100121/2017 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100121/2017 Ms G Waugh v Represented by: Dallas McMillan Solicitors Falkirk Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100121/2017
- Decision date
- 10 July 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100121/2017 Ms G Waugh
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe judgment is a brief disposal order. It records that Ms G Waugh's claim against Falkirk Council had been withdrawn by the claimant and was therefore dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
No substantive findings on liability, remedy, or compensation are set out in the extracted text. The order is signed by Employment Judge Frances Eccles and dated 10 July 2019, with the same date shown as the date sent to the parties.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | The judgment records that the claim was withdrawn by the claimant and dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013. The underlying substantive claim type is not stated in the extracted judgment text; equal_pay is inferred from the case listing metadata. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.