Case 4100127/2013 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 100184/2010 & Others (see attached list) Mrs J Fish & others v Represented by: Thompsons Falkirk Council — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100127/2013
- Decision date
- 17 August 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 100184/2010 & Others (see attached list) Mrs J Fish & others
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a multi-schedule equal pay case brought by Mrs J Fish and others against Falkirk Council. The judgment for Employment Tribunal case 4100127/2013 records that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013.
The judgment does not contain findings on liability, comparators, breach, or any substantive merits issue. It also records no remedy award, so there is no monetary figure attached to the disposition. The case was disposed of by withdrawal rather than by a merits determination.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Equal pay | Multiple equal pay claims in the attached schedule against Falkirk Council; the judgment states that the claims had been withdrawn by the claimants and were dismissed under Rule 52 of the Employment Tribunals Rules of Procedure 2013. | Withdrawn | — | — |
Legal tests applied
1 reference- Rule 52 of the Rules contained in Schedule 1 of the Employment Tribunals (Constitution and Rules of Procedure) Regulations 2013
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.