Case 4100136/2024 · Employment Tribunal
Mrs E Connor v Tots Bots Limited (In Liquidation) — 2024
- Case reference
- 4100136/2024
- Decision date
- 11 December 2024
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge J McCluskey
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mrs E Connor
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe Employment Judge issued judgment on the available material under rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013. No response had been presented. The respondent was in compulsory liquidation, but the relevant court had granted permission for these proceedings to continue on 03 December 2024.
The tribunal held that the claimant was entitled to bring the claim because it concerned a failure relating to the election of employee representatives, and the claimant had been an employee dismissed as redundant. The judgment records that there was no recognised trade union for the purposes of collective bargaining.
The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with sections 188 and 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992 was found to be well founded. The tribunal found that the respondent had dismissed as redundant more than 20 employees at one establishment within 90 days or less, and that it failed both to ensure employee representatives were elected in accordance with section 188A and to consult with them in accordance with section 188.
A protective award was made in respect of employees dismissed as redundant by the respondent at its site at 259 Summerlee Street, Queenslie Industrial Estate, Glasgow, G33 4DB. The judgment states that the protected period began on 10 November 2023 and lasted for 90 days, with remuneration ordered for that protected period. No monetary figure for the award is stated in the extracted judgment text.
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trade union | Rule 21 judgment on a complaint under sections 188 and 188A TULRCA 1992; no response was presented. The respondent was in compulsory liquidation, and permission to continue the proceedings had been granted on 03 December 2024. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
3 references- rule 21 of the Employment Tribunal Rules of Procedure 2013
- section 188 of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
- section 188A of the Trade Union and Labour Relations (Consolidation) Act 1992
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.