Case 4100147/2023 · Employment Tribunal
Mr M Strachan and others (see attached schedule) v Thevegankind Ltd (In Administration) — 2023
- Case reference
- 4100147/2023
- Decision date
- 5 April 2023
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge M Whitcombe
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Mr M Strachan and others (see attached schedule)
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe tribunal found that the claimant group were affected employees for the purposes of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006 after being told on 12 October 2022 that their employment had transferred to Lillie SPV Limited. There was no recognised trade union or other appropriate representative of affected employees. The respondent did not present a response, and the judgment was issued under rule 21 on the available material.
The tribunal held that, because there were no other appropriate representatives, the respondent was obliged under regulations 13(3)(b)(ii) and 14 to facilitate the election of employee representatives and to provide them with information about the transfer and consult them. It found that the respondent failed to facilitate such an election and therefore failed to inform and consult any representatives before the transfer. The judgment records that the respondent took no reasonable steps at all towards compliance and that there were no special circumstances making compliance not reasonably practicable.
The complaint that the respondent failed to comply with regulations 13 and 14 was found well founded, and the tribunal made a declaration and award under regulation 15(8). Because there had been a complete failure to comply with the consultation obligations, the tribunal held that appropriate compensation under regulation 15(8)(a) was 13 weeks' pay for each affected employee listed in the attached schedule. The tribunal also recorded that Lillie SPV Limited, as transferee, was jointly and severally liable for that award under regulation 15(9).
Claims and outcomes
1 finding recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Transfer of undertakings (TUPE) | Rule 21 judgment on the available material. The tribunal found the respondent failed to comply with TUPE regulations 13 and 14 by not facilitating election of employee representatives and not informing or consulting them. A declaration and award were made under regulation 15(8). The claim against Lillie SPV Limited was withdrawn before it was dismissed from the proceedings. | Upheld | — | — |
Legal tests applied
4 references- regulations 13 and 14 of the Transfer of Undertakings (Protection of Employment) Regulations 2006
- regulation 15(8) TUPE 2006
- regulation 15(9) TUPE 2006
- regulation 13(3)(b)(ii) TUPE 2006
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.