Case 4100150/2022 · Employment Tribunal
Raffi v Representing himself NHS Lothian — 2022
- Case reference
- 4100150/2022
- Decision date
- 2 September 2022
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge McFatridge Mohammed
- Venue
- Edinburgh
Parties
2 namedClaimant
Raffi
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant brought claims of unfair dismissal and disability discrimination arising from his dismissal by NHS Lothian. The unfair dismissal claim was withdrawn before the preliminary hearing. The remaining issue was whether the disability discrimination claim, lodged after early conciliation in January 2022 in relation to an effective date of termination of 24 September 2020, was out of time and whether time should be extended on a just and equitable basis.
The tribunal accepted that the claimant had a longstanding back injury and later headaches, and that he corresponded with the respondent, his union, CAB resources, and the Information Commissioner about workplace ventilation and lighting issues. It also accepted that he was genuinely unaware of the tribunal time limit, but found that his explanation for the delay was vague and that the evidence did not show a sufficient reason for waiting until January 2022 to begin early conciliation and lodge the ET1.
Applying section 123 of the Equality Act 2010, and referring to Robertson v Bexley Community Centre and British Coal Corporation v Keeble, the tribunal treated the latest possible date for the alleged discriminatory acts as 24 September 2020. It held that, on the best view for the claimant, the case was about 13 months late. The tribunal found that the length of delay, the lack of a reasonable explanation, the likely prejudice to the respondent's evidence, and the absence of prompt action or adequate steps to obtain advice meant it was not just and equitable to extend time. The disability discrimination claim was therefore dismissed for want of jurisdiction.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unfair dismissal | The judgment states that the claimant subsequently withdrew the unfair dismissal claim and that it was thereafter dismissed. | Withdrawn | — | — |
| Disability discrimination | Dismissed because the tribunal held the claim was out of time and it was not just and equitable to extend time under section 123 of the Equality Act 2010. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
Legal tests applied
5 references- s.123 Equality Act 2010
- s.123(1)(b) just and equitable extension
- s.123(3) continuing act
- Robertson v Bexley Community Centre [2003] IRLR 434
- British Coal Corporation v Keeble
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.