Case 4100173/2019 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100173/2019 Mr D Panczak v Allbar Facility Management Solutions Ltd — 2019
- Case reference
- 4100173/2019
- Decision date
- 25 March 2019
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Frances Eccles
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100173/2019 Mr D Panczak
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThis was a Rule 21 judgment issued on the available material because the response to the claim had been rejected and there was no outstanding application for reconsideration. Employment Judge Frances Eccles decided the case without a hearing, and the hearing listed for 29 March 2019 was cancelled.
The tribunal upheld two claims. First, it found that Allbar Facility Management Solutions Ltd had made an unauthorised deduction from Mr D Panczak's wages and ordered payment of £818.23. Second, it found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £288.91.
No other claims, legal tests, or separate remedy components are identified in the judgment text. The total award recorded from the two ordered sums is £1,107.14.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have made an unauthorised deduction from wages and was ordered to pay £818.23. | Upheld | — | £818 |
| Holiday pay | Rule 21 judgment: the respondent was found to have failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and was ordered to pay £288.91. | Upheld | — | £289 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £1,107
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.