Case 4100173/2020 · Employment Tribunal
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100173/2020 Miss B McDonald v Mrs Sajida Chaudry — 2020
- Case reference
- 4100173/2020
- Decision date
- 4 March 2020
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Ian McPherson
Parties
2 namedClaimant
EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100173/2020 Miss B McDonald
Respondent
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, so the tribunal issued a rule 21 judgment on the available material. It found that the respondent had failed to provide the claimant with written pay statements, despite requests, and made a declaration to that effect.
The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement. It ordered the respondent to pay the claimant £866. The judgment does not record any further split of the award or any additional remedy beyond that sum.
Claims and outcomes
2 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Other | The tribunal made a declaration that the respondent failed to provide the claimant with written pay statements, despite requests, under rule 21. | Upheld | — | — |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal found that the respondent failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and ordered payment of £866. | Upheld | — | £866 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £866
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
- Open official judgment 1 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 2 PDF on gov.uk
- Open official judgment 3 PDF on gov.uk
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.