Case 4100173/2024 · Employment Tribunal

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100173/2024 Held at Aberdeen on October 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie v Mr David Adamczyk — 2024

Case reference: 4100173/2024
Decision date: 17 October 2024
Jurisdiction: Scotland
Venue: Aberdeen

Indexed: 23 May 2026

Parties

2 named

Claimant

EMPLOYMENT TRIBUNALS (SCOTLAND) Case No: 4100173/2024 Held at Aberdeen on October 2024 Employment Judge N M Hosie

Respondent

Mr David Adamczyk

Key findings

Tribunal's reasoning

The claimant, Mr David Adamczyk, brought complaints of unfair dismissal, race discrimination and religion or belief discrimination against Aberdeen City Council. The tribunal found that the effective date of termination was 17 August 2023, that the claimant notified ACAS on 30 October 2023, and that the ACAS certificate was issued by email on 11 December 2023. Under the early conciliation extension provisions, the claimant then had one month to submit his tribunal claim, but he did not present the claim form until 12 January 2024, which was one day late.

Claims and outcomes

3 findings recorded

Claim type	Issue or finding	Outcome	Protected characteristic	Award
Unfair dismissal	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claim form was presented one day out of time and the tribunal did not extend time under the reasonably practicable test.	Dismissed	—	—
Race discrimination	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claim was presented one day out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time.	Dismissed	Race	—
Religion or belief discrimination	Dismissed for want of jurisdiction because the claim was presented one day out of time and the tribunal was not satisfied that it was just and equitable to extend time.	Dismissed	Religion or belief	—

Legal tests applied

8 references

Official outcome judgment PDF

Gov.uk primary record

The official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.

Open official judgment PDF on gov.uk

Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

How we got this data

Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.

Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.