Case 4100177/2020 · Employment Tribunal
Members: Mr J McElwee Ms M McAllister Mr G Urquhart v Limited (in Liquidation) and 1 other — 2021
- Case reference
- 4100177/2020
- Decision date
- 23 November 2021
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge A Strain
- Venue
- Glasgow
- Panel members
- Mr J McElwee, Ms M McAllister
Parties
3 namedClaimant
Members: Mr J McElwee Ms M McAllister Mr G Urquhart
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningThe claimant was employed as General Manager and his employment transferred to the Second Respondent under TUPE in May 2019. The parties agreed that he had a qualifying disability of anxiety and depression/PTSD, but the respondents disputed knowledge of disability at the relevant time. The tribunal generally accepted the respondents' evidence where it conflicted with the claimant's evidence.
On notice pay, the tribunal found the employment contract contained clear notice wording and there was no evidence of common mistake. The claimant was entitled to one week's notice per complete year of service and had already been paid that sum, so the breach of contract claim failed.
On unfair dismissal, the tribunal found a genuine redundancy situation following a significant downturn in the Second Respondent's business. It found the General Manager role could be removed with duties redistributed, that consultation on 23 and 30 September and 15 October 2019 was fair and meaningful, and that no viable alternative role was available.
On the section 15 disability discrimination claim, the claimant identified the investigations, rather than redundancy, as the alleged unfavourable treatment. The tribunal found the investigations were necessary, appropriate, fair and reasonable, that no link to disability was established, and that the Second Respondent did not know of the claimant's disability at the relevant time.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disability discrimination | Claim brought under section 15 Equality Act 2010. The tribunal found the alleged unfavourable treatment was not made out as arising from disability and that the Second Respondent had no knowledge of the disability at the relevant time. | Dismissed | Disability | — |
| Breach of contract | Notice pay claim. The tribunal found the contractual notice provision was clear and that the claimant had been paid one week's notice for each complete year of service. | Dismissed | — | — |
| Unfair dismissal | The tribunal found the dismissal was by reason of redundancy and was procedurally and substantively fair. | Dismissed | — | — |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £0
- across all upheld claims
Legal tests applied
6 references- s.139(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- Moon v Homeworthy Furniture (Northern) Ltd [1976] IRLR 298
- s.98(4) Employment Rights Act 1996
- s.86(1) Employment Rights Act 1996
- section 15 Equality Act 2010
- section 6 Equality Act 2010
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.