Case 4100184/2017 · Employment Tribunal
R Gall Mr D Scachill v Andrew Brownhill & Jacquie Berrie T/a The Hand Job Car Wash — 2017
- Case reference
- 4100184/2017
- Decision date
- 8 March 2017
- Jurisdiction
- Scotland
- Judge
- Employment Judge Mr
Parties
2 namedClaimant
R Gall Mr D Scachill
Key findings
Tribunal's reasoningNo response was presented to the claim, and Employment Judge Robert Gall issued judgment under rule 21 on the available material. The respondent, Andrew Brownhill & Jacquie Berrie t/a The Hand Job Car Wash, did not contest the claim, and the hearing listed for 19 April 2017 was cancelled.
On the material before the tribunal, the respondent had made an unauthorised deduction from the claimant's wages and was ordered to pay £8,000. The tribunal also found that the respondent had failed to pay the claimant's holiday entitlement and awarded £2,388.88, stated to represent 14.33 days of leave accrued but not taken at the time employment ended.
The tribunal further ordered payment of £2,000, described as two weeks' wages, for the failure to issue the claimant a statement of written terms and conditions of employment. The total monetary award recorded in the judgment is £12,388.88.
Claims and outcomes
3 findings recorded| Claim type | Issue or finding | Outcome | Protected characteristic | Award |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unlawful deduction from wages | Recorded from the judgment. | Upheld | — | £8,000 |
| Holiday pay | The tribunal held the respondent had failed to pay holiday entitlement and awarded £2,388.88, described as 14.33 days of leave accrued but not taken at the time of termination of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,389 |
| Other | The tribunal ordered £2,000, described as two weeks' wages, in respect of the failure to issue a statement of written terms and conditions of employment. | Upheld | — | £2,000 |
Remedy
Monetary award- Total award
- £12,389
- across all upheld claims
Official outcome judgment PDF
Gov.uk primary recordThe official judgment PDF on gov.uk contains the tribunal's outcome, reasoning, and any remedy details. Where this page does not yet show extracted outcomes for every claim, use the PDF as the authoritative source.
Published on gov.uk under the Open Government Licence v3.0.
How we got this data
Case essentials (reference, date, judge, venue, country, claim categories) are extracted from the structured metadata gov.uk publishes alongside each decision. Parties and monetary figures are extracted from the judgment PDF text. Key findings and per-claim outcomes require a second extraction pass that is not yet complete for this case — until then, the primary source linked above is the authoritative record. See full methodology.
Named in this case and want it removed? Submit a takedown request. The page will be withdrawn on receipt and the editor will follow up within five working days.